The AI tool vetting checklist and register.
Twelve questions a school answers before it approves any AI teacher assistant, and one register that records the answer. Built for the tools your staff are probably already using, Brisk and MagicSchool among them, which both start free and both arrive in the building before anyone bought them. A small school can fill this in inside a week. Every blank is a real answer or an honest “we don’t know yet.”
1. The paperwork
Four questions that are answered on the vendor’s own pages, if you know where to look. Write down the URL you read and the date you read it. These pages change.
2. The plumbing
How the tool gets into the building, and whether the school controls what’s on inside it.
3. What it does to a named child
This is the section that decides the register. A tool that drafts a newsletter and a tool that writes a comment about a named student are not the same category of thing, even when they sit in the same menu.
4. The contract, and the person
Two worked examples
The two most used AI teacher assistants, with the answers we could read on their own published pages on 2 September 2026. Nothing here is a judgement of either product. Vendors update these pages often, so confirm against the current page before you rely on a line.
| Question | Brisk Teaching | MagicSchool AI |
|---|---|---|
| 01 Privacy agreement | National Data Privacy Agreement signed in 25 states as of Nov 2025; district DPA where no state one exists. Student data addendum updated Aug 2026. | Standard DPA published; National Data Privacy Agreements on the SDPC registry; custom DPA on Enterprise. |
| 02 Sub-processors | Published list names OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity, GPTZero and Sapling for AI roles. Does not say which model runs which tool. | FAQ names OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The sub-processor exhibit filed with the SDPC lists hosting and analytics vendors only. Ask for the current list. |
| 03 Training | “Never used to train, fine-tune, or improve AI models.” | Children’s personal information is not used to train AI; zero-data-retention attestations cited from Anthropic and OpenAI. |
| 04 Retention | Underlying student work not stored after a task completes; data returned or destroyed within 30 days of termination. | Deletion or return within 60 days of contract end. |
| 05 Single sign-on | Google and Microsoft on all tiers; Clever and ClassLink for schools. | Google and Microsoft on all tiers; Clever and ClassLink on Enterprise. |
| 06 Rostering | Clever, ClassLink, OneRoster 1.1 and 1.2 files, SFTP. | Clever and ClassLink on Enterprise; Canvas and Schoology through Edlink. |
| 07 Tool switches | Admin dashboard on the paid school tier. | Tool Access controls by school site on Enterprise. |
| 08 Uptime | Status page reports 99.71% for the extension, June to September 2026. | Status page shows a seven-hour degradation on 31 August to 1 September 2026. |
| 09 Named-student outputs | Writing feedback (single, batch, inline comments) and Inspect Writing, which includes AI-text detection the vendor says gives no accuracy score. | IEP generator, accommodation suggestions, report card comments, writing feedback. |
| 10 Student side | Brisk Boost: activities by link or code, no student accounts; teacher sees all chats; concerning content auto-flagged. | MagicStudent rooms by code or link; hourly insights, thread export, severity-tiered alerts. Named student persona retired in February 2026. |
| 11 Terms | No refunds; licence may be terminated “for any or no reason”; perpetual, sublicensable licence over user contributions. | Not read for this table. Read it yourself and write the answer here. |
| 12 Who answers here | ________ | ________ |
The register
One row per tool. A tool that isn’t on this page isn’t approved, and staff should be able to say that sentence out loud. Review the whole page once a term.
| Tool and tier | Approved uses | Never here | Agreement date | Owner | Review date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
From The Library at School Systems Lab. If your team wants the review done with them, tool by tool, that’s the Lab’s responsible AI and EdTech work. Free to use and share within your school. © Leading Bright Scholars, Inc., d/b/a School Systems Lab.
Approving the tool is the easy half.
- The boundaries your staff actually remember belong on one page. That is Library No. 03, the staff AI boundaries one-pager. Fill it in after this register, not before, so the never list matches what the approved tools can do.
- The reasoning, with the U.S. Department of Education and UNESCO sources, is in Brief No. 01, AI governance begins with a decision.
- When a teacher drafts in one of these tools and then needs the plan checked against the standards and the accommodations in the room, that handoff is Library No. 06, the generator-to-plan handoff. On the software side, no AI reads a student record in any ClearPath product, and the data page says so in plain language.
The rest of the shelf is in the free Library.